Contact

Matchup Analytics exists as a reference resource for fantasy sports managers who take the analytical side of the game seriously. This page explains who the site serves, what kinds of questions and messages receive a response, and what to realistically expect after sending one. Getting the most out of any correspondence starts with matching the message to the right scope.

Service area covered

Matchup Analytics operates as a national reference resource covering fantasy sports analysis across the four major North American professional leagues — NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL. The site's editorial focus runs from foundational concepts like positional matchup analysis and opponent-adjusted statistics through applied decision frameworks like start-sit decisions, waiver wire targeting, and DFS stack building.

Correspondence is welcomed from fantasy managers, analysts, researchers, and educators operating anywhere in the United States. The site does not provide personalized sports betting advice, injury prognosis, or real-time player news — those are genuinely different problems that belong to different kinds of resources.

The distinction worth drawing here: questions about how matchup analysis works and how to apply it fall squarely within scope. Questions asking for a specific week's lineup recommendation based on personal roster details fall outside it — not because they're unwelcome in spirit, but because that kind of individualized advice isn't something a reference site can responsibly provide at scale.

What to include in your message

A well-structured message gets a faster, more useful response. The following breakdown covers what to include depending on message type.

For content feedback or factual corrections:

For topic or coverage suggestions:

1. Why it represents a genuine gap — what question it answers that existing pages on key dimensions and scopes or the glossary don't already address

For research or editorial inquiries:

Messages that arrive as a single vague sentence — "can you help me with fantasy football?" — don't give enough to work with. That's not a judgment, just physics.

Response expectations

Response times vary depending on message volume and complexity. Factual corrections that include a named source and a clear page reference tend to move fastest — typically within 3 to 5 business days. Topic suggestions and editorial inquiries take longer because they require actual evaluation, not just acknowledgment.

A few honest calibrations:

• Not every message receives a reply. Messages outside the site's scope, duplicate submissions, or requests that are essentially asking the site to do someone's fantasy research for them are unlikely to generate a response.
• Corrections that check out get incorporated. When a factual issue is verified against a named public source — say, a figure from the fantasy points allowed framework that's been superseded by updated league data — the content gets updated. The sender isn't always notified individually, but the correction happens.
• Topic suggestions influence the editorial calendar. A suggestion for a page on how weather affects matchup analysis or sample size and reliability may not result in a reply, but if the gap is real, it gets added to the development queue.

The site operates with a small editorial team rather than a 24-hour support infrastructure. Treating it accordingly produces better outcomes for both sides.

Additional contact options

The primary contact method is the message form on this page. For specific types of needs, a few alternatives may be more efficient.

Self-service before messaging: The frequently asked questions page resolves the most common conceptual questions about how matchup data is interpreted and applied. The how-to-get-help page addresses navigational and research workflow questions. Between those 2 pages, a significant portion of incoming questions answer themselves.

For structured learning: The how it works page and the advanced metrics section are built specifically for managers who want to go deeper without needing to ask — the kind of systematic reference that holds up across a full season rather than just one week's decisions.

For sport-specific questions: The sport landing pages — NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL — each carry context specific to how matchup analysis operates within that sport's particular scoring structures, positional roles, and data availability. A question that seems general often turns out to be sport-specific once it's examined closely, and those pages frequently surface the answer without any back-and-forth needed.

Messages sent through the contact form are reviewed in the order received. There's no escalation path, no priority queue, and no phone line — which, given that matchup analytics is mostly a spreadsheet-and-patience discipline anyway, seems about right.